Add community skills, agents, system prompts from 22+ sources
Community Skills (32): - jat: jat-start, jat-verify, jat-complete - pi-mono: codex-cli, codex-5.3-prompting, interactive-shell - picoclaw: github, weather, tmux, summarize, skill-creator - dyad: 18 skills (swarm-to-plan, multi-pr-review, fix-issue, lint, etc.) - dexter: dcf valuation skill Agents (23): - pi-mono subagents: scout, planner, reviewer, worker - toad: 19 agent configs (Claude, Codex, Gemini, Copilot, OpenCode, etc.) System Prompts (91): - Anthropic: 15 Claude prompts (opus-4.6, code, cowork, etc.) - OpenAI: 49 GPT prompts (gpt-5 series, o3, o4-mini, tools) - Google: 13 Gemini prompts (2.5-pro, 3-pro, workspace, cli) - xAI: 5 Grok prompts - Other: 9 misc prompts (Notion, Raycast, Warp, Kagi, etc.) Hooks (9): - JAT hooks for session management, signal tracking, activity logging Prompts (6): - pi-mono templates for PR review, issue analysis, changelog audit Sources analyzed: jat, ralph-desktop, toad, pi-mono, cmux, pi-interactive-shell, craft-agents-oss, dexter, picoclaw, dyad, system_prompts_leaks, Prometheus, zed, clawdbot, OS-Copilot, and more
This commit is contained in:
43
skills/community/dexter/dcf/sector-wacc.md
Normal file
43
skills/community/dexter/dcf/sector-wacc.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
# Sector WACC Adjustments
|
||||
|
||||
Use these typical WACC ranges as starting points, then adjust based on company-specific factors.
|
||||
|
||||
## Determining Company Sector
|
||||
|
||||
Use `financial_search` with query `"[TICKER] company facts"` to retrieve the company's `sector`. Match the returned sector to the table below.
|
||||
|
||||
## WACC by Sector
|
||||
|
||||
| Sector | Typical WACC Range | Notes |
|
||||
|--------|-------------------|-------|
|
||||
| Communication Services | 8-10% | Mix of stable telecom and growth media |
|
||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 8-10% | Cyclical exposure |
|
||||
| Consumer Staples | 7-8% | Defensive, stable demand |
|
||||
| Energy | 9-11% | Commodity price exposure |
|
||||
| Financials | 8-10% | Leverage already in business model |
|
||||
| Health Care | 8-10% | Regulatory and pipeline risk |
|
||||
| Industrials | 8-9% | Moderate cyclicality |
|
||||
| Information Technology | 8-12% | Assess growth stage; higher for high-growth |
|
||||
| Materials | 8-10% | Cyclical, commodity exposure |
|
||||
| Real Estate | 7-9% | Interest rate sensitivity |
|
||||
| Utilities | 6-7% | Regulated, stable cash flows |
|
||||
|
||||
## Adjustment Factors
|
||||
|
||||
Add to base WACC:
|
||||
- **High debt (D/E > 1.5)**: +1-2%
|
||||
- **Small cap (< $2B market cap)**: +1-2%
|
||||
- **Emerging markets exposure**: +1-3%
|
||||
- **Concentrated customer base**: +0.5-1%
|
||||
- **Regulatory uncertainty**: +0.5-1.5%
|
||||
|
||||
Subtract from base WACC:
|
||||
- **Market leader with moat**: -0.5-1%
|
||||
- **Recurring revenue model**: -0.5-1%
|
||||
- **Investment grade credit rating**: -0.5%
|
||||
|
||||
## Reasonableness Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- WACC should typically be 2-4% below ROIC for value-creating companies
|
||||
- If calculated WACC > ROIC, the company may be destroying value
|
||||
- Compare to sector peers if available
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user