Add community skills, agents, system prompts from 22+ sources
Community Skills (32): - jat: jat-start, jat-verify, jat-complete - pi-mono: codex-cli, codex-5.3-prompting, interactive-shell - picoclaw: github, weather, tmux, summarize, skill-creator - dyad: 18 skills (swarm-to-plan, multi-pr-review, fix-issue, lint, etc.) - dexter: dcf valuation skill Agents (23): - pi-mono subagents: scout, planner, reviewer, worker - toad: 19 agent configs (Claude, Codex, Gemini, Copilot, OpenCode, etc.) System Prompts (91): - Anthropic: 15 Claude prompts (opus-4.6, code, cowork, etc.) - OpenAI: 49 GPT prompts (gpt-5 series, o3, o4-mini, tools) - Google: 13 Gemini prompts (2.5-pro, 3-pro, workspace, cli) - xAI: 5 Grok prompts - Other: 9 misc prompts (Notion, Raycast, Warp, Kagi, etc.) Hooks (9): - JAT hooks for session management, signal tracking, activity logging Prompts (6): - pi-mono templates for PR review, issue analysis, changelog audit Sources analyzed: jat, ralph-desktop, toad, pi-mono, cmux, pi-interactive-shell, craft-agents-oss, dexter, picoclaw, dyad, system_prompts_leaks, Prometheus, zed, clawdbot, OS-Copilot, and more
This commit is contained in:
56
skills/community/dyad/e2e-rebase/SKILL.md
Normal file
56
skills/community/dyad/e2e-rebase/SKILL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: dyad:e2e-rebase
|
||||
description: Rebase E2E test snapshots based on failed tests from the PR comments.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# E2E Snapshot Rebase
|
||||
|
||||
Rebase E2E test snapshots based on failed tests from the PR comments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
1. Get the current PR number using `gh pr view --json number --jq '.number'`
|
||||
|
||||
2. Fetch PR comments and look for the Playwright test results comment. Parse out the failed test filenames from either:
|
||||
- The "Failed Tests" section (lines starting with `- \`filename.spec.ts`)
|
||||
- The "Update Snapshot Commands" section (contains `npm run e2e e2e-tests/filename.spec.ts`)
|
||||
|
||||
3. If no failed tests are found in the PR comments, inform the user and stop.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Build the application binary:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
npm run build
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT:** E2E tests run against the built binary. If any application code (anything outside of `e2e-tests/`) has changed, you MUST run this build step before running E2E tests, otherwise you'll be testing the old version.
|
||||
|
||||
5. For each failed test file, run the e2e test with snapshot update:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
PLAYWRIGHT_HTML_OPEN=never npm run e2e e2e-tests/<testFilename>.spec.ts -- --update-snapshots
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
6. After updating snapshots, re-run the same tests WITHOUT `--update-snapshots` to verify they pass consistently:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
PLAYWRIGHT_HTML_OPEN=never npm run e2e e2e-tests/<testFilename>.spec.ts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If any test fails on this verification run, inform the user that the snapshots may be flaky and stop.
|
||||
|
||||
7. Show the user which snapshots were updated using `git diff` on the snapshot files.
|
||||
|
||||
8. Review the snapshot changes to ensure they look reasonable and are consistent with the PR's purpose. Consider:
|
||||
- Do the changes align with what the PR is trying to accomplish?
|
||||
- Are there any unexpected or suspicious changes?
|
||||
|
||||
9. If the snapshots look reasonable, commit and push the changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
git add e2e-tests/snapshots/
|
||||
git commit -m "Update E2E snapshots"
|
||||
git push
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
10. Inform the user that the snapshots have been updated and pushed to the PR.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user