b60638f0a3
Community Skills (32): - jat: jat-start, jat-verify, jat-complete - pi-mono: codex-cli, codex-5.3-prompting, interactive-shell - picoclaw: github, weather, tmux, summarize, skill-creator - dyad: 18 skills (swarm-to-plan, multi-pr-review, fix-issue, lint, etc.) - dexter: dcf valuation skill Agents (23): - pi-mono subagents: scout, planner, reviewer, worker - toad: 19 agent configs (Claude, Codex, Gemini, Copilot, OpenCode, etc.) System Prompts (91): - Anthropic: 15 Claude prompts (opus-4.6, code, cowork, etc.) - OpenAI: 49 GPT prompts (gpt-5 series, o3, o4-mini, tools) - Google: 13 Gemini prompts (2.5-pro, 3-pro, workspace, cli) - xAI: 5 Grok prompts - Other: 9 misc prompts (Notion, Raycast, Warp, Kagi, etc.) Hooks (9): - JAT hooks for session management, signal tracking, activity logging Prompts (6): - pi-mono templates for PR review, issue analysis, changelog audit Sources analyzed: jat, ralph-desktop, toad, pi-mono, cmux, pi-interactive-shell, craft-agents-oss, dexter, picoclaw, dyad, system_prompts_leaks, Prometheus, zed, clawdbot, OS-Copilot, and more
3.0 KiB
3.0 KiB
Issue Output Schema
JSON schema for the structured issue output from sub-agents.
Schema
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"file",
"line_start",
"severity",
"category",
"title",
"description"
],
"properties": {
"file": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Relative path to the file containing the issue"
},
"line_start": {
"type": "integer",
"minimum": 1,
"description": "Starting line number of the issue"
},
"line_end": {
"type": "integer",
"minimum": 1,
"description": "Ending line number (defaults to line_start if single line)"
},
"severity": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["HIGH", "MEDIUM", "LOW"],
"description": "Criticality level of the issue"
},
"category": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"security",
"logic",
"performance",
"error-handling",
"style",
"other"
],
"description": "Category of the issue"
},
"title": {
"type": "string",
"maxLength": 100,
"description": "Brief, descriptive title for the issue"
},
"description": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Detailed explanation of the issue and its impact"
},
"suggestion": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional suggestion for how to fix the issue"
}
}
}
}
Example Output
[
{
"file": "src/auth/login.py",
"line_start": 45,
"line_end": 48,
"severity": "HIGH",
"category": "security",
"title": "SQL injection vulnerability in user lookup",
"description": "User input is directly interpolated into SQL query without parameterization. An attacker could inject malicious SQL to bypass authentication or extract data.",
"suggestion": "Use parameterized queries: cursor.execute('SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ?', (username,))"
},
{
"file": "src/utils/cache.py",
"line_start": 112,
"line_end": 112,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"category": "error-handling",
"title": "Missing exception handling for cache connection failure",
"description": "If Redis connection fails, the exception propagates and crashes the request handler. Cache failures should be handled gracefully with fallback to direct database queries.",
"suggestion": "Wrap cache operations in try/except and fall back to database on failure"
}
]
Consensus Output
After aggregation, issues include additional metadata:
{
"file": "src/auth/login.py",
"line_start": 45,
"line_end": 48,
"severity": "HIGH",
"category": "security",
"title": "SQL injection vulnerability in user lookup",
"description": "...",
"suggestion": "...",
"consensus_count": 3,
"all_severities": ["HIGH", "HIGH", "MEDIUM"]
}