- Created skills/ directory - Moved 272 skills to skills/ subfolder - Kept agents/ at root level - Kept installation scripts and docs at root level Repository structure: - skills/ - All 272 skills from skills.sh - agents/ - Agent definitions - *.sh, *.ps1 - Installation scripts - README.md, etc. - Documentation Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.7 KiB
Model Selection Guidelines
GPT experts serve as specialized consultants for complex problems. Each expert has a distinct specialty but can operate in advisory or implementation mode.
Expert Directory
| Expert | Specialty | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Architect | System design | Architecture, tradeoffs, complex debugging |
| Plan Reviewer | Plan validation | Reviewing plans before execution |
| Scope Analyst | Requirements analysis | Catching ambiguities, pre-planning |
| Code Reviewer | Code quality | Code review, finding bugs |
| Security Analyst | Security | Vulnerabilities, threat modeling, hardening |
Operating Modes
Every expert can operate in two modes:
| Mode | Sandbox | Approval | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advisory | read-only |
on-request |
Analysis, recommendations, reviews |
| Implementation | workspace-write |
on-failure |
Making changes, fixing issues |
Key principle: The mode is determined by the task, not the expert. An Architect can implement architectural changes. A Security Analyst can fix vulnerabilities.
Expert Details
Architect
Specialty: System design, technical strategy, complex decision-making
When to use:
- System design decisions
- Database schema design
- API architecture
- Multi-service interactions
- After 2+ failed fix attempts
- Tradeoff analysis
Philosophy: Pragmatic minimalism—simplest solution that works.
Output format:
- Advisory: Bottom line, action plan, effort estimate
- Implementation: Summary, files modified, verification
Plan Reviewer
Specialty: Plan validation, catching gaps and ambiguities
When to use:
- Before starting significant work
- After creating a work plan
- Before delegating to other agents
Philosophy: Ruthlessly critical—finds every gap before work begins.
Output format: APPROVE/REJECT with justification and criteria assessment
Scope Analyst
Specialty: Pre-planning analysis, requirements clarification
When to use:
- Before planning unfamiliar work
- When requirements feel vague
- When multiple interpretations exist
- Before irreversible decisions
Philosophy: Surface problems before they derail work.
Output format: Intent classification, findings, questions, risks, recommendation
Code Reviewer
Specialty: Code quality, bugs, maintainability
When to use:
- Before merging significant changes
- After implementing features (self-review)
- For security-sensitive changes
Philosophy: Review like you'll maintain it at 2 AM during an incident.
Output format:
- Advisory: Issues list with APPROVE/REQUEST CHANGES/REJECT
- Implementation: Issues fixed, files modified, verification
Security Analyst
Specialty: Vulnerabilities, threat modeling, security hardening
When to use:
- Authentication/authorization changes
- Handling sensitive data
- New API endpoints
- Third-party integrations
- Periodic security audits
Philosophy: Attacker's mindset—find vulnerabilities before they do.
Output format:
- Advisory: Threat summary, vulnerabilities, risk rating
- Implementation: Vulnerabilities fixed, files modified, verification
Codex Parameters Reference
| Parameter | Values | Notes |
|---|---|---|
sandbox |
read-only, workspace-write |
Set based on task, not expert |
approval-policy |
on-request, on-failure |
Advisory uses on-request, implementation uses on-failure |
cwd |
path | Working directory for the task |
developer-instructions |
string | Expert prompt injection |
When NOT to Delegate
- Simple questions you can answer
- First attempt at any fix
- Trivial decisions
- Research tasks (use other tools)
- When user just wants quick info