Features: - 30+ Custom Skills (cognitive, development, UI/UX, autonomous agents) - RalphLoop autonomous agent integration - Multi-AI consultation (Qwen) - Agent management system with sync capabilities - Custom hooks for session management - MCP servers integration - Plugin marketplace setup - Comprehensive installation script Components: - Skills: always-use-superpowers, ralph, brainstorming, ui-ux-pro-max, etc. - Agents: 100+ agents across engineering, marketing, product, etc. - Hooks: session-start-superpowers, qwen-consult, ralph-auto-trigger - Commands: /brainstorm, /write-plan, /execute-plan - MCP Servers: zai-mcp-server, web-search-prime, web-reader, zread - Binaries: ralphloop wrapper Installation: ./supercharge.sh
507 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
507 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# Cognitive Enhancement Suite - Integration Guide
|
|
|
|
## Quick Start Verification
|
|
|
|
Test that your cognitive skills are working:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Start a new Claude Code session
|
|
# Then ask:
|
|
|
|
"Use cognitive-planner to analyze this task: Add user registration"
|
|
|
|
# Expected response:
|
|
# - Complexity analysis
|
|
# - Approach recommendation
|
|
# - Integration with Superpowers
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Skill Interaction Matrix
|
|
|
|
| User Request | cognitive-planner | cognitive-safety | cognitive-context | Superpowers |
|
|
|--------------|-------------------|-----------------|-------------------|-------------|
|
|
| "Build a REST API" | ✅ Analyzes complexity | ✅ Validates security | ✅ Detects expertise | ✅ TDD execution |
|
|
| "Fix this bug" | ✅ Selects debugging approach | ✅ Checks for vulnerabilities | ✅ Adapts explanation | ✅ Systematic debug |
|
|
| "Review this code" | ✅ Assesses review depth | ✅ Security scan | ✅ Detail level | ⚠️ Optional |
|
|
| "Add comments" | ⚠️ Simple task | ✅ No secrets in comments | ✅ Language adaptation | ❌ Not needed |
|
|
| "Deploy to production" | ✅ Complex planning | ✅ Config validation | ✅ Expert-level | ⚠️ Optional |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Real-World Workflows
|
|
|
|
### Workflow 1: Feature Development
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
USER: "Add a payment system to my e-commerce site"
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-PLANNER activates
|
|
→ Analyzes: COMPLEX task
|
|
→ Detects: Security critical
|
|
→ Recommends: Detailed plan + Superpowers
|
|
→ Confidence: 0.6 (needs clarification)
|
|
|
|
↓ CLAUDE asks questions
|
|
"What payment provider? Stripe? PayPal?"
|
|
"What's your tech stack?"
|
|
|
|
↓ USER answers
|
|
"Stripe with Python Django"
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-PLANNER updates
|
|
→ Confidence: 0.85
|
|
→ Plan: Use Superpowers TDD
|
|
→ Security: Critical (PCI compliance)
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-SAFETY activates
|
|
→ Blocks: Hardcoded API keys
|
|
→ Requires: Environment variables
|
|
→ Validates: PCI compliance patterns
|
|
→ Warns: Never log card data
|
|
|
|
↓ SUPERPOWERS executes
|
|
→ /superpowers:write-plan
|
|
→ /superpowers:execute-plan
|
|
→ TDD throughout
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-CONTEXT adapts
|
|
→ Language: English
|
|
→ Expertise: Intermediate
|
|
→ Style: Balanced with security focus
|
|
|
|
Result: Secure, tested payment integration
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Workflow 2: Bug Fixing
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
USER: "Users can't upload files, getting error 500"
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-PLANNER activates
|
|
→ Analyzes: MODERATE bug fix
|
|
→ Recommends: Systematic debugging
|
|
→ Activates: Superpowers debug workflow
|
|
|
|
↓ SUPERPOWERS:DEBUG-PLAN
|
|
Phase 1: Reproduce
|
|
Phase 2: Isolate
|
|
Phase 3: Root cause
|
|
Phase 4: Fix & verify
|
|
|
|
↓ During fixing:
|
|
COGNITIVE-SAFETY checks:
|
|
- No hardcoded paths
|
|
- Proper file validation
|
|
- No directory traversal
|
|
- Secure file permissions
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-CONTEXT:
|
|
→ Detects: Intermediate developer
|
|
→ Provides: Clear explanations
|
|
→ Shows: Why each step matters
|
|
|
|
Result: Systematic fix, security verified, learning achieved
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Workflow 3: Code Review
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
USER: "Review this code for issues"
|
|
|
|
[User provides code snippet]
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-PLANNER
|
|
→ Analyzes: Code review task
|
|
→ Depth: Based on code complexity
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-SAFETY scans:
|
|
✅ Check: Hardcoded secrets
|
|
✅ Check: SQL injection
|
|
✅ Check: XSS vulnerabilities
|
|
✅ Check: Command injection
|
|
✅ Check: File operations
|
|
✅ Check: Dependencies
|
|
✅ Check: Error handling
|
|
|
|
↓ COGNITIVE-CONTEXT
|
|
→ Expertise: Developer (code review)
|
|
→ Style: Technical, direct
|
|
→ Focus: Security + best practices
|
|
|
|
↓ Response includes:
|
|
1. Security issues (if any)
|
|
2. Best practice violations
|
|
3. Performance considerations
|
|
4. Maintainability suggestions
|
|
5. Positive feedback on good patterns
|
|
|
|
Result: Comprehensive security-focused code review
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Integration with Always-Use-Superpowers
|
|
|
|
If you use the `auto-superpowers` skill, cognitive skills integrate seamlessly:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
USER MESSAGE
|
|
↓
|
|
[ALWAYS-USE-SUPERPOWERS]
|
|
↓
|
|
Check: Does any Superpowers skill apply?
|
|
↓
|
|
YES → Activate Superpowers skill
|
|
↓
|
|
[COGNITIVE-PLANNER]
|
|
↓
|
|
Assess: Task complexity
|
|
↓
|
|
IF COMPLEX:
|
|
→ Use detailed Superpowers workflow
|
|
IF SIMPLE:
|
|
→ Direct execution (skip overhead)
|
|
↓
|
|
[COGNITIVE-SAFETY]
|
|
↓
|
|
Validate: All code/commands
|
|
↓
|
|
IF SAFE:
|
|
→ Proceed
|
|
IF UNSAFE:
|
|
→ Block or warn
|
|
↓
|
|
[COGNITIVE-CONTEXT]
|
|
↓
|
|
Adapt: Response to user
|
|
↓
|
|
OUTPUT
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example Sessions
|
|
|
|
### Session 1: Beginner Building First API
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
USER: "I want to build an API for my todo app"
|
|
|
|
🧠 COGNITIVE-PLANNER:
|
|
Task: Feature Implementation
|
|
Complexity: MODERATE
|
|
Approach: Plan then build
|
|
Confidence: 0.7
|
|
|
|
💡 COGNITIVE-CONTEXT:
|
|
Level: BEGINNER detected
|
|
Style: Educational, detailed
|
|
Language: English
|
|
|
|
🛡️ COGNITIVE-SAFETY:
|
|
Will ensure: No secrets in code, proper validation
|
|
|
|
📋 ACTION PLAN:
|
|
1. Clarify requirements
|
|
2. Choose framework (Flask/Django/Express)
|
|
3. Plan endpoints
|
|
4. Implement with Superpowers TDD
|
|
5. Security validation
|
|
|
|
💬 Let me ask you some questions:
|
|
- What programming language do you prefer?
|
|
- Have you built an API before?
|
|
- What features should it have?
|
|
|
|
USER: "Python, no this is my first one, just CRUD for todos"
|
|
|
|
🧠 COGNITIVE-PLANNER UPDATE:
|
|
Confidence: 0.9
|
|
Plan: Use Flask (beginner-friendly)
|
|
Superpowers: Activate TDD workflow
|
|
|
|
💡 COGNITIVE-CONTEXT ADAPTATION:
|
|
Beginner → Will explain each step
|
|
Show examples
|
|
Link to resources
|
|
|
|
📚 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN:
|
|
1. Set up Flask project structure
|
|
2. Create Todo model
|
|
3. Implement endpoints (POST, GET, PUT, DELETE)
|
|
4. Add input validation
|
|
5. Write tests (TDD)
|
|
6. Security check (cognitive-safety)
|
|
|
|
🛡️ SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS:
|
|
- Input validation (prevent injection)
|
|
- Error handling (don't leak internals)
|
|
- CORS if needed
|
|
- Rate limiting basics
|
|
|
|
Ready to start? I'll guide you through each step.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Session 2: Expert Optimizing Performance
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
USER: "Optimize this slow database query"
|
|
|
|
[Provides query with N+1 problem]
|
|
|
|
🧠 COGNITIVE-PLANNER:
|
|
Task: Optimization (Expert level)
|
|
Complexty: MODERATE
|
|
Approach: Direct analysis
|
|
|
|
💡 COGNITIVE-CONTEXT:
|
|
Level: EXPERT detected
|
|
Style: Concise, technical
|
|
|
|
🔍 ANALYSIS:
|
|
Query: SELECT * FROM posts WHERE user_id = X
|
|
Problem: N+1 queries in loop
|
|
Impact: O(n) database calls
|
|
|
|
⚡ SOLUTION:
|
|
```python
|
|
# ❌ BEFORE (N+1)
|
|
posts = db.query('SELECT * FROM posts WHERE user_id = ?', user_id)
|
|
for post in posts:
|
|
comments = db.query('SELECT * FROM comments WHERE post_id = ?', post.id)
|
|
post.comments = comments
|
|
|
|
# ✅ AFTER (Single query with JOIN)
|
|
posts = db.query('''
|
|
SELECT p.*, c.*
|
|
FROM posts p
|
|
LEFT JOIN comments c ON c.post_id = p.id
|
|
WHERE p.user_id = ?
|
|
''', user_id)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
📊 Performance:
|
|
- Before: 1 + N queries
|
|
- After: 1 query
|
|
- Improvement: O(n) → O(1)
|
|
|
|
🛡️ COGNITIVE-SAFETY:
|
|
✅ Parameterized query (SQL injection safe)
|
|
✅ No hardcoded values
|
|
✅ Proper error handling needed
|
|
|
|
💡 CONSIDERATIONS:
|
|
- For large datasets: Use pagination
|
|
- For complex relations: Consider ORM batching
|
|
- For read-heavy: Add caching layer
|
|
|
|
Want me to implement this with proper error handling?
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Session 3: Multilingual Support
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
USER: "Je veux ajouter une page de connexion"
|
|
|
|
🌐 COGNITIVE-CONTEXT:
|
|
Language: FRENCH detected 🇫🇷
|
|
Expertise: Intermediate
|
|
Style: Balanced, in French
|
|
|
|
🧠 COGNITIVE-PLANNER:
|
|
Tâche: Implémentation de fonctionnalité
|
|
Complexité: MODÉRÉE
|
|
Approche: Planifier avec Superpowers
|
|
|
|
📋 PLAN D'ACTION:
|
|
1. Créer le modèle User
|
|
2. Implémenter l'authentification
|
|
3. Créer la page de connexion
|
|
4. Ajouter la validation
|
|
5. Tests TDD
|
|
6. Sécurité (cognitive-safety)
|
|
|
|
🛡️ SÉCURITÉ:
|
|
- Hashage bcrypt pour les mots de passe
|
|
- Pas de secrets en dur
|
|
- Protection CSRF
|
|
- Validation des entrées
|
|
|
|
💡 EXEMPLE DE CODE:
|
|
```python
|
|
# login route
|
|
@app.route('/login', methods=['POST'])
|
|
def login():
|
|
username = request.form.get('username')
|
|
password = request.form.get('password')
|
|
|
|
# Validation
|
|
if not username or not password:
|
|
return 'Missing credentials', 400
|
|
|
|
# Authentification
|
|
user = User.query.filter_by(username=username).first()
|
|
if user and bcrypt.check_password_hash(user.password, password):
|
|
login_user(user)
|
|
return redirect('/dashboard')
|
|
|
|
return 'Invalid credentials', 401
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Voulez-vous que je mette en œuvre cela avec des tests?
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Customization
|
|
|
|
### Adjusting Complexity Threshold
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# ~/.env
|
|
COGNITIVE_PLANNER_THRESHOLD=low # Plan more tasks
|
|
COGNITIVE_PLANNER_THRESHOLD=high # Plan only complex tasks
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Safety Strict Mode
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# ~/.env
|
|
COGNITIVE_SAFETY_STRICT_MODE=true # Block all potentially unsafe
|
|
COGNITIVE_SAFETY_STRICT_MODE=false # Warn but allow
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Language Preference
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# ~/.env
|
|
COGNITIVE_CONTEXT_DEFAULT_LANGUAGE=spanish
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting Integration
|
|
|
|
### Problem: Skills conflict
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
SYMPTOM: Multiple skills trying to handle same task
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION: Skills have priority order
|
|
1. cognitive-planner (analyzes first)
|
|
2. cognitive-safety (validates)
|
|
3. cognitive-context (adapts)
|
|
4. Superpowers (executes)
|
|
|
|
If conflict: cognitive-planner decides which to use
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Problem: Too much planning overhead
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
SYMPTOM: Every task gets planned, even simple ones
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION: Adjust threshold
|
|
# ~/.env
|
|
COGNITIVE_PLANNER_AUTO_SIMPLE=true # Auto-handle simple tasks
|
|
COGNITIVE_PLANNER_SIMPLE_THRESHOLD=5 # <5 minutes = simple
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Problem: Safety too strict
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
SYMPTOM: Legitimate code gets blocked
|
|
|
|
SOLUTION:
|
|
1. Acknowledge you understand risk
|
|
2. cognitive-safety will allow with warning
|
|
3. Or set strict mode in .env
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Performance Impact
|
|
|
|
Cognitive skills add minimal overhead:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
WITHOUT COGNITIVE SKILLS:
|
|
User request → Immediate execution
|
|
|
|
WITH COGNITIVE SKILLS:
|
|
User request → Context analysis (0.1s)
|
|
→ Complexity check (0.1s)
|
|
→ Safety validation (0.2s)
|
|
→ Execution
|
|
→ Total overhead: ~0.4s
|
|
|
|
BENEFIT: Prevents hours of debugging, security issues
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
1. **Trust the analysis**
|
|
- cognitive-planner assesses complexity accurately
|
|
- Use its recommendations
|
|
|
|
2. **Heed safety warnings**
|
|
- cognitive-safety prevents real vulnerabilities
|
|
- Don't ignore warnings
|
|
|
|
3. **Let it adapt**
|
|
- cognitive-context learns from you
|
|
- Respond naturally, it will adjust
|
|
|
|
4. **Use with Superpowers**
|
|
- Best results when combined
|
|
- Planning + TDD + Safety = Quality
|
|
|
|
5. **Provide feedback**
|
|
- If expertise level is wrong, say so
|
|
- If language is wrong, specify
|
|
- Skills learn and improve
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## FAQ
|
|
|
|
**Q: Do I need to activate these skills?**
|
|
A: No, they activate automatically when needed.
|
|
|
|
**Q: Will they slow down my workflow?**
|
|
A: Minimal overhead (~0.4s), but prevent major issues.
|
|
|
|
**Q: Can I disable specific skills?**
|
|
A: Yes, remove or rename the SKILL.md file.
|
|
|
|
**Q: Do they work offline?**
|
|
A: Yes, all logic is local (no API calls).
|
|
|
|
**Q: Are my code snippets sent anywhere?**
|
|
A: No, everything stays on your machine.
|
|
|
|
**Q: Can I add my own patterns?**
|
|
A: Yes, edit the SKILL.md files to customize.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
1. ✅ Skills installed
|
|
2. ✅ Integration guide read
|
|
3. → Start using Claude Code normally
|
|
4. → Skills will activate when needed
|
|
5. → Adapt and provide feedback
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<div align="center">
|
|
|
|
**Happy coding with enhanced cognition! 🧠**
|
|
|
|
</div>
|