admin/glm47-benchmarks
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
04aa3278b6de6b46fdb52df0ede992edbd88cca0
1 Branch 0 Tags
Go to file
Clone
Open with VS Code Open with VSCodium Open with Intellij IDEA
Download ZIP Download TAR.GZ Download BUNDLE

README.md

🚀 GLM-4.7 vs. The $200 Giants: Is China's $3 AI Coding Tool the New Market King?

██████╗ ██╗     ███╗   ███╗      ██╗  ██╗    ███████╗
██╔════╝ ██║     ████╗ ████║      ██║  ██║    ╚════██║
██║  ███╗██║     ██╔████╔██║█████╗███████║        ██╔╝
██║   ██║██║     ██║╚██╔╝██║╚════╝╚════██║       ██╔╝ 
╚██████╔╝███████╗██║ ╚═╝ ██║           ██║       ██║  
 ╚═════╝ ╚══════╝╚═╝     ╚═╝           ╚═╝       ╚═╝  
      THE FRONTIER AGENTIC REASONING MODEL (2025)

💡 Key Takeaways (TL;DR)

  • GLM-4.7 is the new SOTA (State of the Art) AI coding model for 2025.
  • Developed by Zhipu AI, it offers enterprise-level performance matching or exceeding flagship models like Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.1.
  • Price Point: $0.60 per 1M input tokens ($0.11 cached), $2.20 per 1M output tokens vs. $3.00/$15.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.
  • Context Window: Massive 200K tokens for full codebase analysis.
  • Best For: Cost-conscious developers, agentic workflows, and high-complexity debugging.

The global landscape for AI-powered development is shifting. While Western tools like Cursor Pro and GitHub Copilot have dominated by charging premium subscription rates (often reaching $200 per year), a new contender from Beijing, China, has arrived to dismantle that pricing model.

Zhipu AI has released GLM-4.7, a large language model specifically engineered for coding, offering performance that rivals top-tier US models at a fraction of the cost. With a price point of $0.60 per 1M input tokens (dropping to $0.11 with caching) and $2.20 per 1M output tokens, GLM-4.7 is forcing developers to question if expensive subscriptions are still necessary.

⚔️ The Frontier Battle: Verified Benchmarks

GLM-4.7 demonstrates competitive performance against the newest generation of flagship models, including Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.1, based on the latest 2025 public technical reports.

📊 2025 AI Coding Model Performance Comparison

graph TD
    subgraph "2025 Flagship Benchmark Comparison"
    M[Math - AIME 25] --> G1{<b>GLM-4.7: 95.7%</b>}
    M --> C1[Claude Opus 4.5: 93.5%]
    M --> C2[Claude Sonnet 4.5: 87.0%]
    M --> Q1[Qwen-3 Coder: 89.3%]
    M --> D1[DeepSeek-V3.2: 88.0%]
    M --> M1[MiniMax 2.1: 78.0%]
    
    CO[Coding - LiveCode] --> G2{<b>GLM-4.7: 84.9%</b>}
    CO --> C3[Claude Opus 4.5: 64.0%]
    CO --> C4[Claude Sonnet 4.5: 64.0%]
    CO --> Q2[Qwen-3 Coder: 74.8%]
    CO --> D2[DeepSeek-V3.2: 73.3%]
    
    S[Science - GPQA] --> G3{<b>GLM-4.7: 85.7%</b>}
    S --> C5[Claude Opus 4.5: 87.0%]
    S --> C6[Claude Sonnet 4.5: 83.4%]
    S --> D3[DeepSeek-V3.2: 81.0%]
    S --> M2[MiniMax 2.1: 78.0%]
    
    L[Logic - HLE w/Tools] --> G4{<b>GLM-4.7: 42.8%</b>}
    L --> C7[Claude Opus 4.5: 43.2%]
    L --> C8[Claude Sonnet 4.5: 32.0%]
    L --> D4[DeepSeek-V3.2: 27.2%]
    L --> M3[MiniMax 2.1: 31.8%]
    end
    
    classDef glmNode fill:#00c853,stroke:#1b5e20,stroke-width:3px,color:#ffffff,font-weight:bold,font-size:14px
    classDef opusNode fill:#ff9800,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px,color:#ffffff
    classDef sonnetNode fill:#f1f8e9,stroke:#c5e1a5,stroke-width:1px,color:#558b2f
    classDef budgetNode fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3,stroke-width:1px,color:#0d47a1
    
    class G1,G2,G3,G4 glmNode
    class C1,C3,C5,C7 opusNode
    class C2,C4,C6,C8 sonnetNode
    class Q1,Q2,D1,D2,D3,D4,M1,M2,M3 budgetNode
Category Benchmark GLM-4.7 Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 GPT-5.1 Qwen-3 Coder DeepSeek-V3.2 MiniMax 2.1 Source
Math AIME 25 95.7 93.5 87.0 94.0 89.3 88.0 78.0 Z.ai Tech ReportQwen Tech Report
Coding LiveCodeBench 84.9 64.0 64.0 87.0 74.8 73.3 N/A LiveCodeBench v6Qwen Tech Report
Science GPQA-Diamond 85.7 87.0 83.4 88.1 N/A 81.0 78.0 Official Zhipu AIVellum.ai
Logic HLE (w/ Tools) 42.8 43.2 32.0 42.7 N/A 27.2 31.8 Humanity's Last ExamOllama
Engineering SWE-bench (Verified) 73.8% 80.9% 77.2% 74.9% 69.6% 67.8% 69.4% SWE-bench 2025Index.devHugging Face
Agentic τ²-Bench 87.4% N/A 84.7 82.7% N/A 66.7 77.2 Official Z.AIVellum.ai

🛠️ What is GLM-4.7? Technical Specifications and Features

GLM-4.7 is the latest iteration of the General Language Model (GLM) series developed by Beijing-based Zhipu AI. Unlike general-purpose models, GLM-4.7 is optimized heavily for code generation and function calling.

🚀 Key Technical Highlights

  • Extended Context Window (200K): Capable of handling massive codebases in a single prompt, allowing it to "remember" entire file structures better than any previous iteration.
  • Interleaved & Preserved Thinking: A proprietary reasoning architecture that "thinks" before every response and tool call. Preserved Thinking allows the model to retain reasoning blocks across multi-turn conversations, preventing context loss in complex debugging sessions.
  • Turn-level Thinking Control: Developers can toggle reasoning on/off per turn—disabling it for speed in simple tasks or enabling it for high-precision logic in architectural decisions.
  • All-Tools Capabilities: Autonomously browses the web, executes code, and interprets data to solve complex engineering problems without human hand-holding.
  • Extreme Efficiency: Proprietary architecture delivering high inference speeds at a significantly lower cost than current flagship standards like Claude Sonnet 4.5.

📈 Why This Matters for the Future of DevOps

For CTOs and engineering managers, the calculation is changing. The "value add" of a $200 tool is no longer just about ability, but about ROI.

If a $3 model can perform 90% of the tasks that a $200 model can, the justification for high-cost enterprise licenses evaporates. This pressure will likely force Western competitors to lower prices or significantly boost their feature sets to maintain market share.

🔄 The ROI Shift & Competitive Landscape

In 2025, the choice isn't just between "expensive" and "cheap"—it's about choosing the right tool for the job.

Model Family Strength Cost Efficiency Context Window
GLM-4.7 (Z.AI) Agentic Workflows / Multi-step Logic ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Extreme) 200K
DeepSeek-V3.2 Raw Mathematical Logic / Code Synthesis ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Extreme) 128K
Qwen-3 Coder Multilingual Code / Local Deployment ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) 128K
MiniMax 2.1 Efficient Code Synthesis / Compact Model ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Extreme) 128K
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Architectural Nuance / UI/UX Design ⭐ (Low) 200K+
Claude Opus 4.5 Peak Reasoning / Complex Logic ⭐ (Low) 200K+ 
pie title "Yearly Subscription Cost (USD)"
    "Western Giants (Claude/GPT) : $200+" : 200
    "GLM-4.7 / DeepSeek / Qwen / MiniMax : ~$10-20" : 15

❓ FAQ: GLM-4.7 and the AI Coding Market

What is the best cost-effective AI for coding in 2025? The market for high-performance, budget-friendly AI has expanded significantly in 2025. Leading the pack are GLM-4.7 (Zhipu AI), DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen-3 Coder (Alibaba), and MiniMax 2.1. While all four offer performance comparable to Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.5 at a fraction of the cost, GLM-4.7 is often preferred for agentic workflows due to its advanced "Preserved Thinking" architecture. DeepSeek remains a strong choice for raw logic, Qwen excels in multilingual code generation, and MiniMax 2.1 delivers strong performance at roughly half the parameter size of GLM-4.7.

Is GLM-4.7 better than GPT-5.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding? Objectively, Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5.1 currently hold the edge in massive-scale architectural planning and natural language nuance. However, GLM-4.7 has achieved parity or leadership in execution-heavy benchmarks (LiveCodeBench: 84.9) and mathematical reasoning (AIME 25: 95.7). For developers, the choice is often between paying for the absolute peak (Claude/GPT) or achieving 95% of that performance with GLM-4.7 for 1/20th the price.

How much does the GLM-4.7 coding tool cost? The Z.AI Lite plan starts at $9/quarter. For API users, GLM-4.7 is priced at $0.60 per 1M input tokens ($0.11 with caching) and $2.20 per 1M output tokens, significantly undercutting the $3.00/$15.00 token rate of Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Who developed GLM-4.7? GLM-4.7 was developed by Zhipu AI, a leading artificial intelligence company based in Beijing, China, emerging from the Knowledge Engineering Group (KEG) at Tsinghua University.

Can I use GLM-4.7 in the US and Europe? Yes, Zhipu AI's ecosystem is accessible globally. It is natively integrated into popular developer tools like TRAE SOLO, Cline, and Roo Code, allowing developers worldwide to bypass the "$200 AI tax."

🌐 Official Z.AI Ecosystem & Technical Specs

Data sourced from the Official Z.AI Website

GLM-4.7 powers a robust ecosystem designed for high-volume agentic workflows. According to official Z.AI technical specifications, the platform delivers elite-tier performance and deep tool integration.

📊 Technical Performance (LMSYS & Code Arena)

As of 2025-12-22, GLM-4.7 consistently ranks as a top-tier contender on global leaderboards, optimized for engineering-heavy tasks:

  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Flagship): 1482
  • GLM-4.7 (Reasoning Leader): 1452 🥇
  • GPT-5.1 (High): 1410

🛠️ Supported Coding Tools & IDEs

GLM-4.7 is natively compatible with the most advanced coding environments:

  • TRAE (SOLO Agent) - Optimized for real-time tool streaming
  • Claude Code - Full documentation support
  • Cursor - Seamless workflow integration
  • Cline & Roo Code - Advanced agentic capabilities
  • Kilo Code, OpenCode, Goose, Crush

💎 Official Subscription Tiers & Technical Specs

Plan Quarterly Cost Usage Quota Advanced Capabilities
Lite $9 3× Claude Pro GLM-4.7 Powered, Same-tier updates
Pro $45 15× Claude Pro equivalent 40-60% Faster, Vision Analyze, Web Search
Max $90 60× Claude Pro equivalent Peak-hour Guarantee, Early Access, Flagship Updates

Additional Technical Features:

  • Vision Analyze: Interpret UI designs and screenshots directly.
  • Web Search & Reader: Real-time information retrieval for up-to-date documentation.
  • Zread MCP: Enhanced context management via Model Context Protocol.
  • Cross-Model Compatibility: Operates on existing code from other models without breaking architectural integrity.

🎄 Special Christmas Offer

Same as I did, you may get one of the most powerful models for the lowest price, through the current GLM promotions for new year and xmas:

GLM-4.7 Christmas 2025 Discount Coupon: 50% off first purchase plus 10% additional stackable discount with invite code R0K78RJKNW

 ___________________________________________________________
/                                                           \
|   🎄 GLM-4.7 CHRISTMAS EXCLUSIVE CODE 🎄                   |
|  _______________________________________________________  |
| |                                                       | |
| |   🎁  50% OFF FIRST PURCHASE                          | |
| |   🚀  +10% ADDITIONAL STACKABLE DISCOUNT              | |
| |_______________________________________________________| |
|                                                           |
|   INVITE CODE:  R0K78RJKNW                                |
|   STATUS:       ACTIVE [STRICTLY LIMITED]                 |
|                                                           |
\___________________________________________________________/
          \   ^__^
           \  (oo)\_______
              (__)\       )\/\
                  ||----w |
                  ||     ||

🔗 Get +10% additional discount here: https://z.ai/subscribe?ic=R0K78RJKNW 🎟️ Discount Invite Code: R0K78RJKNW

📚 References & Methodology

To ensure transparency and build trust, the data presented in this article is derived from publicly available benchmarks and technical reports as of late 2024 / early 2025:

  • AIME 2025 (Math): Results sourced from the Official Z.AI Portal.
  • LiveCodeBench: Independent evaluation of coding execution accuracy.
  • SWE-bench (Verified): The industry standard for evaluating AI on real-world software engineering issues.
  • HLE (Humanity's Last Exam): A high-difficulty reasoning benchmark where GLM-4.7 (42.8%) significantly outscores Claude Sonnet 4.5 (32.0%).
  • τ²-Bench: State-of-the-art evaluation for multi-step tool orchestration in real-world scenarios.
  • Token Pricing: GLM-4.7 pricing data sourced from BuildingClub Cost Calculator.
  • Claude 4.5 Pricing: Anthropic official documentation for token-based pricing comparison.
  • GLM-4.7 vs MiniMax M2.1: Real-world performance comparison insights from YouTube: "So close to Opus at 1/10th the price (GLM-4.7 and Minimax M2.1 slowdown)".

🔗 Source Links

Note: AI performance metrics are subject to change as models are updated. Users are encouraged to verify latest scores on platforms like LMSYS Chatbot Arena.

The era of the "$200 AI coding tax" is over. Join the GLM revolution today.

Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink
Description
GLM 4.7 benchmarks and specs
Readme 168 KiB